The Site Scan report summarizes how well AI systems can find, read, and trust your pages. You reach it right after a scan finishes, after you claim a scan, or later from a domain’s "Site Scan Report" tab. It reads top to bottom as a story: here is your score, here is the message it tells, here is why (the categories), and here is exactly what to do next.
The overall score and grade #
At the top, under the "Site Snapshot" label, is the big number: your SuperSchema Score out of 100. Next to it sits a letter-grade badge (from A+ down to F) with a label, and a line reading "Better than X% of sites" to put your score in context. Three quick stats sit alongside it: "Evidence" (how many pages were scanned), "Strongest" (your best category), and "Focus" (the category to work on first).
- 96 to 100 · Super
- AI systems have a strong read on your site.
- 80 to 95 · Good
- A strong foundation with a few clear gaps to close.
- 60 to 79 · Fair
- AI can understand parts of your site, but the signal is uneven.
- 40 to 59 · Needs Work
- AI systems are likely missing important context.
- 0 to 39 · Critical
- Major gaps are keeping AI from understanding your site.
The message under your score #
Right above the snapshot, one plain-language sentence summarizes where you stand. It is driven by your score:
- 90 and up
- "AI systems have a strong read on this site."
- 75 to 89
- "The foundation is strong, with a few clear gaps to close."
- 60 to 74
- "AI can understand parts of the site, but the signal is uneven."
- Below 60
- "AI systems are likely missing important context."
The Category Breakdown #
Below the score, the "Category Breakdown" (labeled "Diagnostic Signals") shows five cards, one per category, each with its own 0 to 100 score, band color, and weight. Hover a card to see exactly what SuperSchema checked. The five categories and their weights are:
| Category | Weight | What we check |
|---|---|---|
| Access | 15% | robots.txt allows AI bots, no noindex blocking, pages load without JavaScript. |
| Content | 25% | Word count over 300, good text-to-HTML ratio, meaningful paragraphs. |
| Structure | 15% | Proper H1 heading, logical heading order, lists and tables for data. |
| Schema | 25% | Valid JSON-LD present, relevant schema types, complete required fields. |
| Alternate | 20% | Markdown version available, plain text alternative, files are accessible. |
The Action Plan (priority fixes) #
Further down, the "Action Plan" section is titled "Start with the moves that raise the score fastest." These are the highest-leverage fixes pulled from the scan, ranked so you handle the biggest wins first. A "Projected lift" panel shows your score "Now" and its "Potential" after the listed fixes, with an estimated point gain. Each fix is a card you can act on.
Where to go next #
- Generate schema for the pages the report flags, to raise the Schema category.
- Publish AI-readable Markdown and plain-text files, to raise the Alternate category.
- Fix any Access issues first if that category is low, since it gates everything else.
- Re-scan after your changes to confirm the score moved.